首页 > 学习园地 > 英语学习

GMAT作文范文精选(28)

雕龙文库

【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿,这里小编给大家分享一些,方便大家学习。

  为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了GMAT作文范文精选系列文章,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。

  GMAT作文范文28:Issue

  The following appeared in an article in a consumer-products magazine. Two of todays best-selling brands of full-strength prescription medication for the relief of excess stomach acid, Acid-Ease and Pepticaid, are now available in milder nonprescription forms. Doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for full-strength Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. So people who need an effective but milder nonprescription medication for the relief of excess stomach acid should choose Acid-Ease. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  This ad recommends non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid for relief of excess stomach acid. The only reason offered is that doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for the full-strength prescription form of Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. While this reason is relevant, and provides some grounds for preferring Acid-Ease over Pepticaid, it is insufficient as it stands because it depends on three unwarranted assumptions.

  The first assumption is that the prescription form of Acid-Ease is more popular among doctors. But this might not be the case, even though doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for Acid-Ease. Acid-Ease may have been available for several more years than Pepticaid; and in the years when both products were available, Pepticaid might have actually been prescribed more often than Acid-Ease.

  The second assumption is that doctors prefer the prescription form of Acid-Ease for the reason that it is in fact more effective at relieving excess stomach acid.

  However, doctors may have preferred Acid-Ease for reasons other than its effectiveness. Perhaps Acid-Ease is produced by a larger, more familiar drug company or by one that distributes more free samples. For that matter, the medical community may have simply been mistaken in thinking that Acid-Ease was more effective. In short, the number of prescriptions by itself is not conclusive as to whether one product is actually better than another.

  The third assumption is that the milder non-prescription forms of Acid-Ease and Pepticaid will be analogous to the full-strength prescription forms of each. But this might not be the case. Suppose for the moment that the greater effectiveness of prescription Acid-Ease has been established; even so, the non-prescription form might not measure up to non-prescription Pepticaid. This fact must be established independently.

  In conclusion, this ad does not provide enough support for its recommending non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid. To strengthen its argument, the promoter of Acid-Ease would have to show that the comparison between the number of prescriptions is based on the same time period; its effectiveness is the main reason more doctors have prescribed it, and the comparative effectiveness of the two non-prescription forms is analogous to that of the prescription forms.

  小编提醒:考生们在日常生活中需要多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。

  

  为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了GMAT作文范文精选系列文章,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。

  GMAT作文范文28:Issue

  The following appeared in an article in a consumer-products magazine. Two of todays best-selling brands of full-strength prescription medication for the relief of excess stomach acid, Acid-Ease and Pepticaid, are now available in milder nonprescription forms. Doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for full-strength Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. So people who need an effective but milder nonprescription medication for the relief of excess stomach acid should choose Acid-Ease. Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  This ad recommends non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid for relief of excess stomach acid. The only reason offered is that doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for the full-strength prescription form of Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. While this reason is relevant, and provides some grounds for preferring Acid-Ease over Pepticaid, it is insufficient as it stands because it depends on three unwarranted assumptions.

  The first assumption is that the prescription form of Acid-Ease is more popular among doctors. But this might not be the case, even though doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for Acid-Ease. Acid-Ease may have been available for several more years than Pepticaid; and in the years when both products were available, Pepticaid might have actually been prescribed more often than Acid-Ease.

  The second assumption is that doctors prefer the prescription form of Acid-Ease for the reason that it is in fact more effective at relieving excess stomach acid.

  However, doctors may have preferred Acid-Ease for reasons other than its effectiveness. Perhaps Acid-Ease is produced by a larger, more familiar drug company or by one that distributes more free samples. For that matter, the medical community may have simply been mistaken in thinking that Acid-Ease was more effective. In short, the number of prescriptions by itself is not conclusive as to whether one product is actually better than another.

  The third assumption is that the milder non-prescription forms of Acid-Ease and Pepticaid will be analogous to the full-strength prescription forms of each. But this might not be the case. Suppose for the moment that the greater effectiveness of prescription Acid-Ease has been established; even so, the non-prescription form might not measure up to non-prescription Pepticaid. This fact must be established independently.

  In conclusion, this ad does not provide enough support for its recommending non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid. To strengthen its argument, the promoter of Acid-Ease would have to show that the comparison between the number of prescriptions is based on the same time period; its effectiveness is the main reason more doctors have prescribed it, and the comparative effectiveness of the two non-prescription forms is analogous to that of the prescription forms.

  小编提醒:考生们在日常生活中需要多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。

  

相关图文

推荐文章

网站地图:栏目 TAGS 范文 作文 文案 学科 百科

雕塑 信息流广告 竞价托管 招生通 周易 易经 代理招生 二手车 剧本网 网络推广 自学教程 招生代理 旅游攻略 非物质文化遗产 河北信息网 石家庄人才网 买车咨询 河北人才网 招生考试 精雕图 戏曲下载 河北生活网 好书推荐 工作计划 游戏攻略 心理测试 石家庄网络推广 石家庄招聘 石家庄网络营销 培训网 好做题 游戏攻略 考研真题 代理招生 心理咨询 游戏攻略 兴趣爱好 网络知识 品牌营销 商标交易 游戏攻略 短视频代运营 张家口人才网 秦皇岛人才网 PS修图 宝宝起名 零基础学习电脑 电商设计 职业培训 免费发布信息 服装服饰 律师咨询 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 语料库 范文网 工作总结 二手车估价 短视频剪辑 情侣网名 爱采购代运营 保定招聘 黄金回收价格 情感文案 吊车 古诗词 邯郸人才网 铁皮房 衡水人才网 石家庄点痣 微信运营 养花 名酒回收 石家庄代理记账 女士发型 搜搜作文 石家庄人才网 铜雕 关键词优化 围棋 chatGPT 读后感 玄机派 企业服务 法律咨询 chatGPT国内版 chatGPT官网 励志名言 儿童文学 河北代理记账公司 风水运势 狗狗百科 教育培训 游戏推荐 抖音代运营 朋友圈文案 男士发型 培训招生 文玩 大可如意 保定人才网 沧州人才网 黄金回收 承德人才网 石家庄人才网 模型机 高度酒 沐盛有礼 公司注册 十亩地 造纸术 唐山人才网 沐盛传媒 铜雕厂家