【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
逻辑问题分析论证句式：
1. The fact thatdoes not necessarily imply that
2. Factors such asall have some bearing on
3. Economy, as we know, is influenced by the combination of a host of factors, local, national and international, political, social, and technological.
4. But we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented
5. But the problem is that the two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.
6. According to, but there is no evidence whatsoever to show
7. The argument provides no direct information as to the degree to which
8. There is no evidence whatsoever to indicate that
9. But any conclusion at this stage is premature in absence of a comprehensive examination of
10. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
11. The arguer employs two lines of reasoning to reach this conclusion.
12. To support this claim, the editorial cites statistics indicating that
13. As it stands, this argument suffers from three critical flaws.
14. In this argument, the planning department of an investment firm reaches the conclusion that
15. The basis for this recommendation is the expectation that
16. While this argument has some merit, there are a few assumptions that deserve attention.
17. The example cited, while suggestive of these trends, is insufficient to warrant their truth because there is no reason to believe that the data drawn fromis representative of
18. To begin with, this argument depends on the assumption that
19. Not only does the arguer fail to, he also fails to
20. However, while the poll establishes a correlation betweenand, and also indicates a correlation, though less significantly, betweenand, it does not establish a general causal relationship between
逻辑问题分析论证句式：
1. The fact thatdoes not necessarily imply that
2. Factors such asall have some bearing on
3. Economy, as we know, is influenced by the combination of a host of factors, local, national and international, political, social, and technological.
4. But we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented
5. But the problem is that the two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.
6. According to, but there is no evidence whatsoever to show
7. The argument provides no direct information as to the degree to which
8. There is no evidence whatsoever to indicate that
9. But any conclusion at this stage is premature in absence of a comprehensive examination of
10. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
11. The arguer employs two lines of reasoning to reach this conclusion.
12. To support this claim, the editorial cites statistics indicating that
13. As it stands, this argument suffers from three critical flaws.
14. In this argument, the planning department of an investment firm reaches the conclusion that
15. The basis for this recommendation is the expectation that
16. While this argument has some merit, there are a few assumptions that deserve attention.
17. The example cited, while suggestive of these trends, is insufficient to warrant their truth because there is no reason to believe that the data drawn fromis representative of
18. To begin with, this argument depends on the assumption that
19. Not only does the arguer fail to, he also fails to
20. However, while the poll establishes a correlation betweenand, and also indicates a correlation, though less significantly, betweenand, it does not establish a general causal relationship between
